Free Sample Assignment Guide For Ethical Lens Inventory Reflection

Question: Discuss about the Reflection for Ethical Lens Inventory. Answer: Ethical Lens Inventory The Ethical Lens Inventory is constituted of different and multiple lenses. The inventory first asks us some questions about ourselves so that it can properly determine which of the four lenses best fits our personality. The inventory then utilizes that lens to elaborate to us some of our traits for instance our values and the methods that we use in analyzing situations and problems. Ethical Lens Inventory Reflection In this reflective essay, I would be addressing and elaborating on the results of some of my Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) tests, how the resulted personal ethical lens guide my academic behavior and how the outcomes of my ELI results might in further influence my critical thought process. At first I was a bit confused and cynical about the whole evaluation part. I found it difficult to understand the whole procedure and what the significances of the lenses are.On researching about the inventory and the meaning it held, it became clearer to me and I could go through the whole process clearly and decode my results. My Ethical Lens Inventory results showed that my dominant lens is Relationship and that I use my reasoning skills or rationality for determining which of the processes and systems should be put into position so that fairness and justice gets assured for everyone in the community and result in equality. Equality and rationality are my core values. For me, it says, the value of equality comes before autonomy, which is true. I consider equality as a key ingredient of success. My primary concern for the whole community rests in its well-being and I believe that by assuring the well-being of the community I can assure the fair of treatments of individuals in the best way possible. In addition, sensibility gives way to rationality on my priority list. My dedication towards the application of the universal rules equally for everyone is pretty high, so much that I have to stop myself from making exceptions even in situations where my intuition suggests a more compassionate result. Justice has been found to be my classical virtue, as very clearly I give importance to social balance in addition to believing that it is acquired with the help of loyalty and consistency in the context of dealings with community members. In my mind, the definition of a just system encompasses a predictable system that assist in assuring the wellbeing of everyone, especially those who are powerless. The key phrase of my life is I am fair. Since I give great importance to equality and rationality, I sometimes lean towards assuming that the universal presentation of a just system is the best approach towards achievement of an ethical result. For me, being ethical means being fair. It also defines my idea about an ethical person someone who seeks justice and basic fairness in the community. An ethical person always has the welfare of community on mind, and uses systems in a way so that everyone, especially the powerless, gets the chance to succeed. In terms of authority, I tend to think carefully about any option and the research options it has. In that course I pay particular attention to the views of the specialists in that domain so that the best solution to the problem can be found out. My goal is to always provide a fully informed opinion on any subject or in any situation so that the requirements of the community are met without harming the poor and helpless. Advocacy is my gift. Due to the fact that I'm concerned about being fair, I always work towards achieving what is just for all, what keeps everyone connected with each other in the community. It is in my nature to provide assurance on the coherence of systems and processes, see that they are uniformly followed and that they shield the deprived and helpless without causing undue stress for the rest. My confidence in process has been considered overconfidence and my blind spot. Although I found it a bit difficult to process and accept, the justifications did the talking. At times I trust the process excessively, thinking that the consistent process would result in a just outcome for all. I believe it is a known fact that everyone must get equal access and privileges, but the sad fact is that not everyone does. Unequal access results in unjust outcomes, even if the prices was fair itself. It is a part of my blind spot that I tend to believe that as a natural by-product of universal application of a fair system, ethical decisions comes up. I run a high risk of being authoritarian as I blindly trust the reasonable stems for solving problems. I expect deference to power concentrated inside a hierarchical authority. As I always carefully think about what is right and just in any given situation, or its in my habit that I tend to assume that my way is the best way, and in that I also trends to misuse power in the prices of imposing my will on others for their own good. What I couldn't at all agree upon was that exemption came out as my double standard. I seek justice and equality for all. It is quite incredulous that I would get tempted to exempt myself and some trusted leaders from the rules. The inventory says that I might convince myself that the rules are only meant for our people or the action I am thinking of taking is really just for everyone else, even if my fair self tells me an opposite story. Results say that becoming an ambitious elitist is the vice in my character. It says my personal ambition might at one point overpower my concern towards justice. If it does, then there is the possibility that that I would tend overlook authority exploitations, that to by those who are in leadership positions. This situation would be particularly true if the people in leadership are part of my group and put up the claim of protecting the rights of those who cannot do it good themselves. Two major crises that I might face in my life are isolation and guilt. It's a warning that if I do not start developing the practices of mindfulness and reflection, at some point of time in future I would become isolated. Justice cannot be guaranteed by anyone, not even the fair process, as my fair self asks for. I would definitely start feeling guilty of I start to resent that so less number of people whom I helped feels and seems grateful. As a warning and justification it had been said that if I myself having only a handful of friends, I must think that my excess obsession with justice drives everyone away from me. As an advice I have been asked to see things clearly and start listening to my heart. I have to see whether my intuition agrees with my head for seeing things as it is. To facilitate balance, I have been asked to explore the gifts available in the other lenses in the inventory, especially flexibility and concern for the individual. As I incline towards legalism in the best of times it is imperative for me to concentrate particularly on the uniqueness of any given situation and the probability that an ad-hoc solution would work better than the implementation of universal rules. As I consider what is reasonable I have to remember that I need to temper my activities with sympathy toward people. I have to discover approaches to adjust the privileges of people with the welfare of the entire group and remember to be adaptable. With time, as I figure out how to consider singular viewpoints in my basic leadership techniques I would experience the best of my beliefs with empathy and administe r to everybody. Being a Global Citizen A global citizen is some individual who identifies with being a bit of a rising world gathering and whose exercises add to building this social gathering's qualities and practices (Carter 2013). There are two sorts of characteristics that can depict our creating world gathering: (a) political, financial and sympathetic qualities and (b) singular qualities. Each of these sorts of characteristics is progressing after some time, as the method for global issues change and as a more vital interest creates regarding the essential ethics and morals that underlie the world's mind blowing knowledge customs (Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and others) (Isin 2013). For some experts, global citizenship grasping a universal viewpoint and way of life is an unavoidable truth on the off chance that you need to be educated, drawn in and effective. With new innovations and less expensive travel choices, it's simpler than at any other time to traverse fringes in our own and expert l ives (Urry 2015). I do what I can to comprehend and help, however do not have the methods and learning to wind up distinctly a genuine global citizen. I am as yet attempting to get myself to where I need to be and don't have much time to coordinate toward global interests outside of my own. A global citizen, existing in a rising world gathering, has moral, honorable, political, and money related obligations. For all intents and purposes each global issue has various ethnic, social, political, and money related perspectives joined to it. It is the obligation of global citizens to appreciate these substitute perspectives and progress basic intuition accord among the substitute perspectives and the working of shared conviction courses of action (Deveaux 2015). A global citizen should avoid carrying sides with one particular point of view, and rather search for ways to deal with join all sides. The different perspectives that exist with most global issues regularly are an impression of different social conviction structures. Each of our real social conviction structures passes on regard added to our sweep for answers for the global issues we stand up to. In building a supportable qualities based world gathering it is basic to keep up respect for the world's different social traditions; to attempt to join the pioneers of these particular social traditions who frequently have much in a comparable way as each other; and to help pioneers bring the best segments of their social orders to the task of handling global issues and building world gathering (Oxley and Morris 2013). Global citizens need to interface and make relationship with people from various countries and social orders. Else, we will continue living in disengaged bunches with thin conflict slanted viewpoints on global issues. It is extremely easy to build global associations. Most countries, urban ranges, and towns are right now populated with untouchables and people from different ethnic traditions. The Internet offers an extent of opportunities to interface with people on different issues. So even without voyaging abroad (which is an important thing to do), it is possible to collect an arrangement of individual and get-together cross-country and social associations. Building such frameworks help those included better appreciate their similarities and differentiations and sweep for fundamental responses for the global issues that everyone faces (Larsen 2014). References Carter, A., 2013.The political theory of global citizenship. Routledge. Deveaux, M., 2015. The global poor as agents of justice.journal of moral philosophy,12(2), pp.125-150. Isin, E.F., 2013.Democracy, citizenship and the global city. Routledge. Larsen, M., 2014. Critical global citizenship and international service learning: A case study of the intensification effect.Journal of Global Citizenship and Equity Education,4(1), pp.1-43. Oxley, L. and Morris, P., 2013. Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions.British Journal of Educational Studies,61(3), pp.301-325. Urry, J., 2015. Globalization and citizenship.Journal of world-systems research,5(2), pp.310-324. Berkovich, I. and Eyal, O., 2015. Educational leaders and emotions: An international review of empirical evidence 19922012.Review of Educational Research,85(1), pp.129-167. Ceranic, T.L., 2013, July. Time for a Tune-Up: Engaged Learning for a New Generation of Business Students. InProceedings of the International Association for Business and Society(Vol. 24, pp. 269-277). Champoux, J.E., 2016.Organizational behavior: Integrating individuals, groups, and organizations. Routledge. Covrig, D., Ongo, M. and Ledesma, J.L., 2013. Integrating four types of moral leadership into your organization.Journal of Applied Christian Leadership,6(1). Fassin, Y. and Drover, W., 2015. Ethics in entrepreneurial finance: Exploring problems in venture partner entry and exit.Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-24. Hirstein, W. and Sifferd, K., 2014. Ethics and the Brains of Psychopaths: The Significance of Psychopathy for Our Ethical and Legal Theories. InBrain Theory(pp. 149-170). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Ladkin, D., 2015.Mastering the Ethical Dimension of Organizations: A Self-reflective Guide to Developing Ethical Astuteness. Edward Elgar Publishing. Litzky, B.E., 2012. Review of EthicsGame Simulation.Journal of Business Ethics Education,9, pp.485-488.